The base concern for me with the carbon credits market is: yes, there are tons of buyers (due to regulatory / social reasons). But are there *really* any verifiable sellers? I feel like it’s easier to fraudulently be a seller to capture buyer demand than to actually offset carbonhttps://twitter.com/statelayer/status/1449479159743492101 …
Aren’t the sellers just like … companies that do a bit of pollution but less than their credits allow? So they have some spare credits hanging around?
-
-
How do you verify that they actually did create lower emissions? It’s an oracle problem that relies on self reporting in most cases
-
No, trees sequester carbon at a predictable rate, right?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.