people who paid money for this, how much and why?https://twitter.com/AlexanderGerko/status/1442458242735607809 …
-
-
Replying to @AlexanderGerko
A pretty website and some press releases: $10K A 0.01% bump in brand value: Priceless
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HideNotSlide
also needs a
#WeAreMarketTakers campaign for symmetricity1 reply 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @AlexanderGerko @HideNotSlide
The approved term is “providing liquidity to a resting limit order”
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likes -
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
-
-
Replying to @theemilyaccount @0xdoug and
what if you are a maker, and then immediately after a fill, a taker?
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @AlexanderGerko @theemilyaccount and
Surely no one with any honor would do such a thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @theemilyaccount and
Especially they wouldn't use iceberg orders, peculiarities of how exchanges distribute fills and most certainly they won't ever send a bigger order than their original passive fill
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
We call it uhhhhh… “pre-hedging” 
-
-
Replying to @macrocephalopod @theemilyaccount and
There are many names for this behaviour which any self respecting 'market maker' would find beneath them
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlexanderGerko @macrocephalopod and0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.