You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
So get 2R + R^2 - F’ = 2R - 2F where F’ is the funding on the power perp and F is the funding on the perp. Taking expectations gives σ^2 - F’ = -2F which can be rearranged in two interesting ways,
1. F’ = 2F + σ^2 so the funding on the power perp is at least 2x the funding on the perp, and typically much more. Plugging in some realistic numbers I would expect a funding rate of 0.2-0.4% per day for the power perp — that’s huge!
2. σ^2 = F’ - 2F, this is more interesting since both F and F’ are observable and you can use them to derive an at-the-money implied vol for the underlying. Could use this in a yield strategy (sell power perps and hedge) or to do vol arb of power perps vs options.
I think you could go further — the higher order power perps depend on R^3, R^4 etc and I haven’t bothered to do the math but I’m pretty sure you could get an implied skewness/kurtosis from their traded prices which gives you most of a vol surface.
It’s be cool if an exchange listed these and they became popular, it seems like a much more straightforward way to get leverage and volatility exposure than options.
Someone should definitely list these because I can almost guarantee they will trade at negative implied vols in a big selloff and it will be really fun to come in and scoop them up cheap vs a 2x short in perpetuals.
yeah, this is roughly in range with where we were estimating pricing coming in for squeeth / eth^2
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
