-
-
-
The issue there is the second line makes a little assumption. That's sort of true only in the limit
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Come on this like the first page of TAOCP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
X=.999999… 10X=9.999999 9X=10X-X=9 X=1
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd say no, because 0.999...^inf = 0, whereas 1^inf = 1. But I assume this does not abide by the rules math PhD's made up about what counts as proof, so

-
no, because your first equation is false.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These points are to the left of 1, and they get closer and closer to 1.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you define real numbers as the limits or rational numbers a la Dedekind you basically use a math technique to consider these are the same object.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.