A nice mental model in poker is to measure your profits in “Sklansky dollars” instead of real dollars. A Sklansky dollar is the expected value from a play if you knew what every other player held.
-
Show this thread
-
For example, you hold AA vs KK pre-flop and your opponent goes all in for $100. If you call you have about an 83% chance of winning a $200 pot, so your Sklansky dollar profit from calling is 83% x $200 - $100 = $66
2 replies 0 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
Clearly you will either lose or gain $100 depending on how the cards fall, but that’s just luck. Measuring success in Sklansky dollars instead of real dollars removes an element of chance from the game, making performance measurement more reliable.
1 reply 0 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
If your per-hand profit in real dollars is going up, that could be because you’re getting better but it could just be luck. If your Sklansky dollar profit is going up, that’s likely to be because you’re getting better.
1 reply 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
Sports betters can use a similar heuristic. Instead of measuring profit in real dollars, assume the odds immediately before the start of the game are accurate, and measure your profit in terms of how much the odds moved in your favour from when you bet to when the game started.
1 reply 0 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
By removing the randomness from the game from your measurement, you can zero in much faster on your true edge and calibrate your bet size and frequency more appropriately.
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
An application in finance is transaction cost analysis. If you measure execution slippage vs arrival price, it’s very noisy. Instead measure it vs a VWAP over your execution window, or if measuring slippage in single names, adjust the benchmark to take account of how much the …
2 replies 1 retweet 36 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @macrocephalopod
this only work for small ish participation rates right? in the extreme if you're 100% of volume over an interval your fill price is the VWAP so you have no slippage relative to VWAP but you may have massively bid up the price relative to arrival
4 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
Yup for sure! In that case you can do some of the other stuff, like controlling for quasi-exogenous index/sector/factor price movement over the trade window. Slippage vs vwap is a different thing to slippage vs arrival anyway and you may not want to use it even in a liquid mkt.
-
-
Replying to @macrocephalopod @JessicaNutt96
There are also... other metrics
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
bounded, complete, compact
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.