There is a high correlation between: - people who write philosophical articles on the dangers and flaws of the sharpe ratio - people whose sharpe ratio sucks
-
-
Replying to @therobotjames
Isn't that the point though? Those people are saying high sharpe ratio portfolios are bad bc usually hiding something dangerous - they argue an antifragile low sharpe ratio is desirable so they write that and target that bc they believe in it
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @SquishChaos
Yeah it is. Absolutely. Focusing on any summary metric without understanding the process that generated it is dumb.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @therobotjames @SquishChaos
Really just trying to emulate the
@macrocephalopod playbook of saying something provocative, turning the phone off, and drinking wine.1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @therobotjames @SquishChaos
Sharpe ratio is a perfectly good metric for most strategies, even ones with moderate skewness. It only really fails for very fat tails or very pronounced skewness. See also standard deviation, which is a totally fine and useful risk measure for almost all strategies.
3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes
Totally agree that there is a correlation between people who hate the Sharpe ratio and people who frequently need to write investor letters promising that the big payday is just around the corner, as soon as the market crashes, honest guys.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.