Vol twitter is fantastic because there is so much drama and noise and fury over which pet theory is right, and then you look up the 10y returns of the biggest, noisiest accounts and the only appropriate response is “....eh”
-
Show this thread
-
The entire premise of long vol funds is that they improve geometric return of a stock portfolio, but I took the returns of two of the big vol accounts, computed the optimal allocation to them to maximise long term geometric return, and the answer in both cases was 0%
6 replies 0 retweets 71 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ebitdaddy90
One problem is not enough leverage/wrong fee model. If you need to invest 20% of your portfolio in a long vol fund to see a meaningful impact, the drag on returns is going to be too big to bear.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @ebitdaddy90
Universa/Spitznagel have the right model. They expect to return -100% on most quarters (+4000% in crashes) so you need to keep topping up, but it’s very capital efficient.
4 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @ebitdaddy90
In that case, why not buy the qtr put yourself?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
If you know what you're doing that is almost certainly a better model.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.