Vol twitter is fantastic because there is so much drama and noise and fury over which pet theory is right, and then you look up the 10y returns of the biggest, noisiest accounts and the only appropriate response is “....eh”
-
Show this thread
-
The entire premise of long vol funds is that they improve geometric return of a stock portfolio, but I took the returns of two of the big vol accounts, computed the optimal allocation to them to maximise long term geometric return, and the answer in both cases was 0%
6 replies 0 retweets 71 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ebitdaddy90
One problem is not enough leverage/wrong fee model. If you need to invest 20% of your portfolio in a long vol fund to see a meaningful impact, the drag on returns is going to be too big to bear.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @ebitdaddy90
Universa/Spitznagel have the right model. They expect to return -100% on most quarters (+4000% in crashes) so you need to keep topping up, but it’s very capital efficient.
4 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @ebitdaddy90
i don't think they are much better...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pierre_pfarr @ebitdaddy90
Can't see their returns so I can't say. But at least they aren't pointlessly tying up cash in money mkt funds.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @ebitdaddy90
Imo they play smoke n mirrors with their returns. I will say most vol funds will pitch you a similar structure.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Oh for sure. Huge noise when they have a big quarter, absolute silence on all the -100% quarters.
-
-
Would be funny, Breaking news! Universa lost 100% for the last 10 quarters or 1000%!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.