can someone smarter than me explain how the big pod shop model (Millennium, Citadel etc.) generally works pretty well? The whole idea of yanking the portfolio after some non-outlier drawdown in a relatively short period of time shouldn't really add any value imo
-
-
3. If you think you have some selection edge in hiring, then cutting the pods that lose money and keeping the ones that make money can actually be a pretty good way to refine that edge!
-
4. you are less concerned with losing a few million $ on a large number of pods, what worries you is missing a pod that can generate hundreds of millions per year (so as well as aggressively cutting losers, you aggressively scale winners to capacity)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.