That’s why the pink/blue lines are coincident on that’s why the pink/blue lines are coincident on 31 Dec but the pink line increases much faster (at least, that is what I believe from my convos with them — I haven’t checked the numbers)
You don’t quite have this right! The Bespoke research assumes that that Archegos maintained a constant 5:1 leverage, ie they were leveraged 5:1 on 31st Dec and then continued to buy stock to maintain 5:1 lev as prices went up after that.
-
-
-
Bespoke were very clear that they were using lagged data and that the data they provided was a theoretical upper bound on Archegos exposure derived from the 13-Fs, but this info was dropped in the FT chart, and misreported further in subsequent tweets.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
e.g. see here, but yes $100b is nowhere near street estimates of total losses (Archegos + CS + Nomura + the rest)https://twitter.com/pearkes/status/1378437699946868744 …
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.