Article seems to be wrong on several major points? • "The fund was not overly levered" • "Its risk was not hidden" • "Hwang typically ran dollar-neutral portfolios" • "Analysts had full insight into Archegos’ ... position sizes"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-03-30/wall-street-archegos-collapse-is-business-as-usual-not-a-disaster …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't worry though they have "sophisticated quantitative models"pic.twitter.com/nDZmS66cTv
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This, diversified should not be taken to mean hedged appropriately.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ploy to both placate risk dept at sell-side and lower funding costs? Assuming 5bps funding over interbank, dollar neutral L/S funding would be Pay: Libor+5, Receive Libor-5 for 10bps fixed financing vs Libor+5 for long only. Plus convince risk to allow "vol targeting" ^^
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.