Article seems to be wrong on several major points? • "The fund was not overly levered" • "Its risk was not hidden" • "Hwang typically ran dollar-neutral portfolios" • "Analysts had full insight into Archegos’ ... position sizes"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-03-30/wall-street-archegos-collapse-is-business-as-usual-not-a-disaster …
-
-
This is particularly awful. If you have a concentrated long book in stocks which are broadly all in the same sector, and you hedge that with index futures ... that is a bad hedge! You are taking a fuckload of risk if you do that!pic.twitter.com/zeyB2xxGKE
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Yes exactly this. And a handful of articles have made this same mistake I think.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.