Like given the fund went from $10-15bn to ~$0 in like a week, without a major event or liquidity crisis, I would probably say it was overly levered?
-
-
Show this thread
-
There is a *massive* difference between a quant equity book (carefully hedged to sector, country and factor exposures) which can run 10-15x leverage and still be pretty low volatility vs. levered 5x long in concentrated shitcos "hedged" with index futures
Show this thread -
This is particularly awful. If you have a concentrated long book in stocks which are broadly all in the same sector, and you hedge that with index futures ... that is a bad hedge! You are taking a fuckload of risk if you do that!pic.twitter.com/zeyB2xxGKE
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Like sure, yeah, it was dollar neutral but nobody should’ve underwritten the basis risk inherent in concentrated long/short index portfolio at that kind of leverage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Certainly seems at odds with a lot of the chatter (granted, it's chatter) that suggested the "$50-100bn" was LMV and the book was very much not dollar-neutral.
-
"These analysts had full insight into Archegos’ capital position, position sizes, risk management, processes, strategy and other factors." If this was true, why would the PBs need to have a joint call to unwind the positions (as reported by Bloomberg)?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If he had the same leverage and portfolio on $50mm he probably wouldn’t have blown up. Seemed to me more concentration/liquidity and counter-party risk.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was he not running a dollar neutral portfolio?
-
Can’t find the numbers right now but reports seem to suggest he wasn’t
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.