We’re going to hear a lot about equity total return swaps over the next couple of days but let me take a second to point out how extremely normal they are and how unsurprising it should be to find out that Archegos was using them.
-
-
But the use of TRS in and of itself should not be controversial, it is pretty normal and boring. If they are adequately collateralised they can be perfectly safe (this does not seem to have been the case with Archegos!)
Show this thread -
Here are some actual good takes on TRS from people who actually understand them (unlike me)https://twitter.com/saanglee/status/1376522517259513857?s=20 …
Show this thread -
Guillermo writes like he assumes everyone is as smart as he is so this one may be a bit wonky, but trust me it's goodhttps://twitter.com/NewRiverInvest/status/1376438692965883904?s=20 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Don’t know for sure but it sounds quite plausible, buying tens of billions of ES futures near the close could definitely have moved the price.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Do you think any of the PBs were incentivized to understand whether Archegos’ total book was hedged appropriately? Or are they pretty narrowly focused on the margin for each individual TRS?
-
The PBs don’t see the total return swaps; the ISDA counterparties do. They only see their swaps though. They certainly look at the risk of that sub-portfolio when deciding whether or not to allow extend more credit (in the risk sense).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Hello Joe, the whole thread from
@macrocephalopod is compiled now. Read it here:https://threader.app/thread/1376431761169788933 …
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.