[hesitantly raising hand in seminar] do you think ... possibly ... there might be nepotism at work here? is that a thing we should study? or inherited strong networks and superior networking opportunities? but mostly, like, nepotism? [gunshot rings out]https://twitter.com/aaronclauset/status/1375116257473789953 …
-
-
I mean sure, I use that as an extreme example to suggest that a population correlation might not be that helpful for investigating a tail- after all, we're talking about a profession that (hopefully) selects strongly for intelligence. What assumption did you use for your figures?
-
Prob(PhD) = sigmoid, centered at 120, capped at 10%, calibrated to result in ~2% of the population getting a PhD (which is the rate for 25-64 year olds in the US)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
We’d love to know.