The "explanation" is lack of convection in space which slows aging. If we assume it stopped the aging process completely (unlikely) then you are comparing the same wine from the same vintage at 20 vs. 21 years of aging. No one can tell the difference.
-
-
Show this thread
-
They asked two experts, one couldn't tell the difference and the other thought the wine that had stayed on earth tasted younger, the opposite of what you should expect given the explanation in the article!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The documentary Sour Grapes is a good watch if you haven't seen it already. Most of the "expert" wine tasters are clowns.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if Chateau Petrus wanted extreme consistency and more gradual aging in their wines they'd be better off using a screw cap with a PTFE seal than shooting them into space
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it the lack of convection that slows aging or the time dilation due to relativity?pic.twitter.com/GU5C0bX8BL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nothing related to this post but I thought you may like/want this. Though not sure how to clean this one
https://i.imgur.com/yCAO6B6.gifv Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.