Yeah and a bunch of equally probable unpredictable things could also happen to all the stocks that go in and out of the index.
-
-
Replying to @therobotjames @edwin_teejay and
Its a one way problem isn't it? How often does a stock rise in price and then get dropped from the index for a stock that just fell in price?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @breakingthemark @edwin_teejay and
Stocks that get removed tend to be those that have decreased in market cap. Stocks that get added tend to be those that have increased. I'm unclear why you think this is a form of performance bias in the index.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @therobotjames @breakingthemark and
To bias the performance of the index you would need to believe that the stocks being added would have different future expected returns than the stocks being removed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @therobotjames @edwin_teejay and
This isn't about the index its about the performance of the individual stock. If a stock falls below $5 and then comes back above it later, your data set does not include the gain the stock received. I the above example, your data says stock lost 8%. In real life it was flat.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @breakingthemark @therobotjames and
That's a bias because there is no way for the opposite to occur. And this isn't about momentum or mean reversion, its just about randomness.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @breakingthemark @therobotjames and
There’s no bias. The data doesn’t include moves from $4.80 to $5.20 but it also doesn’t include equally likely moves from $4.80 to $4.40. Adding or dropping stocks based on their past price moves can’t introduce a bias unless future price moves are correlated with past moves.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @breakingthemark and
If this bias existed then it would be trivially easy to make money by shorting stocks that were just above the price level and closing when the dropped below it, and only reopening the short when they came back above the price level.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @breakingthemark and
Actually you could do the same thing on the long side (buy stocks just below the price level, close when they go above it, and reopen the long position if they fall back below).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @breakingthemark and
Of course there is nothing special about the $5 price level, you could do this at every price level from $0.01 to $300,000 to capture as many opportunities as possible, giving huge breadth and a near certainty of making money!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Or perhaps this is another example of how you can derive stupid results by making a single stupid assumption, who knows 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.