I’m saying start with $100 dollars, 50 in cash and 50 in the asset. At the end of each day, observe your new allocation has shifted because of the days returns. Then, rebalance 50/50 of whatever NAV you have left into cash and the asset. This is different from your example.
-
-
That would be *exactly* the same as what I already did, except that the 'equity' variable would be multiplied by 100 to simulate starting with $100 instead of $1. It wouldn't change the overall result except that instead of ending with $0.000005 it would end with $0.0005
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @zzzrrrzzz12 and
If we started with a stock with a *geometric* return of zero instead of *arithmetic* return zero the story would be different and you could make money (before costs) by rebalancing every day, although not at anything like the rate that you are imagining.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If a stock has arithmetic return of 0 you can just short it to harvest the vol decay because of the 1/2 sigma^2. Another way to make money from noise.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Lmao no you absolutely cannot
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @zzzrrrzzz12 and
If you shorted the stock (even in a nice, frictionless theoretical work) the vol drag still works against you, because it's a quadratic term (i.e. it is not sensitive to sign) In the real world you would lose money even faster because *gestures at real-world frictions*
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It’s the negative of a quadratic, so you can flip the sign
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Here are the simulated results for holding either 50% long weight or 50% short weight (rebalanced every day) in a stock with arithmetic return zero.pic.twitter.com/6NP9fK3kWU
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @zzzrrrzzz12 and
I am showing you the simulation results as a courtesy, but I shouldn't need to because all of this is trivially deducible using math. If it is not trivial or obvious to you, then you need to spend more time studying math!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I suspect he was talking about shorting *without* rebalancing. Why wouldn't that work?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That would be fine, it would work.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.