The entire point is that it’s a bait and switch! There is absolutely no way that you can read the entire thread and conclude “yes, it would be possible to make money from this” unless you are a moron. It’s 1%/day volatility zero arithmetic drift geometric brownian motion.
-
-
Well, I'd like to think I'm not a moron, and it wasn't clear to me the arithmetic mean was 0 until you explicitly said so. Maybe that was immediately clear to non-morons before you said so?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Mean zero is the *best case* for the strategy I described! If mean > 0 then a reversion strategy is short more often than long so it would lose money. If mean < 0 then a reversion strategy is long more than it is short so it would lose money.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @goldstein_aa and
This is such a weird argument to be having. I literally generated some random data and people want to tell me you can develop profitable trading strategies for it. Is this what going insane feels like?
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Sometimes the real world feels insane. If you generated completely random zero-mean R and *multiplied* (1+R) by itself repeatedly - you'd have complete noise that you could become incredibly rich off of. Sorry, but it's true. Don't kill the messenger.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Please, describe what the strategy here is, then go and simulate it. It will *at best* be flat.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Please do. Of course, this is gross of tcost. Please keep that in mind. But you can make money.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Gross of tcost is fine. I’m still waiting for a description of the strategy though?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Here's the strat. Let's say we have a portfolio of 50% cash / 50% your simulated stock. At the end of each day, rebalance this portfolio back to 50/50. Basically, you buy more stock if it goes down and sell some if it went up that day. Let me know the returns you see.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zzzrrrzzz12 @macrocephalopod and
So were you able to try this out?
@macrocephalopod1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I didn't bother responding because it so obviously doesn't work, but since you followed up - I implemented exactly what is described in this tweet (matab code in image) https://twitter.com/goldstein_aa/status/1370887341750038528?s=20 …pic.twitter.com/EMXiwPazXM
-
-
Replying to @macrocephalopod @zzzrrrzzz12 and
I then implemented your strategy here (matlab code in the first image, resulting account equity in the second image)pic.twitter.com/ra0MLhWGLZ
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @zzzrrrzzz12 and
macrocephalopod Retweeted macrocephalopod
The reason it loses money is explained in the first tweet I made after several insane people started bringing up Shannon's demonhttps://twitter.com/macrocephalopod/status/1370830168319799298?s=20 …
macrocephalopod added,
macrocephalopod @macrocephalopodReplying to @macrocephalopod @zzzrrrzzz12 @breakingthemarkShannon’s demon needs +ve arithmetic return but flat or negative geometric return. I generated this data myself so I know it has zero arithmetic return! The fact that you would argue with me about data *that I made up* is simply a confirmation that you are an idiot.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.