This is awesome, I like the idea of plotting sharpe as a function of parameter setting to find the sweet spot... good to bet on multiple settings tho for robustness. Since this series randomm,Any xtra steps u do to scrutinize whether it works bc of luck? Or is that always a risk
-
-
Replying to @M1tchRosenthal @macrocephalopod
1. Don’t do any of these steps
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InfoRatioed @macrocephalopod
Are you saying, dont try to find simple tendencies like this? I think maybe it's worth exploring, bc if the asset remains stable you can make money in theory
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @M1tchRosenthal @macrocephalopod
1. Don’t look for the thing you’re testing 2. Don’t overfit parameters based on the thing you’re targeting 3. Don’t simply select the best parameter value from one historical test 4. Understand max theoretical sharpe ratio for a given strategy (# indie bets)
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @InfoRatioed @macrocephalopod
Never tried 4, how do you calculate that? For 2&3, isnt it true that you have to pick parameters at a certain pt to run the strat? If so, may as well optimize w history, avg bets betw top 3 parameterVals, check sensitivity to param not too high. For 1, what should we do instd?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Is number 4 related to Grinold & Kahn IR = IC x sqrt (breadth)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yup
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So this is what not to do, instead do we need to start from an economic thesis and try to linearly model some future excess returns based on particular input variables? Is there truly no pt in testing the consistency of certain simple/naive tendencies/patterns 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @M1tchRosenthal @macrocephalopod and
In thry, maybe we observe a particular asset tends to have two regimes, small mean reversion around trend, and messy chop, if we have a good model at identifying these regimes, when we trade the reversion one, couldnt this be a way to design an implementation? Sorry for all theQs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
1. How sure are you that there are really two regimes? Couldn't you just be seeing patterns where there are none? 2. Regime-based models need to be right twice -- first about which regime you are in, second your signal needs to work in that regime.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Doesn't mean it can't work, but it's a hell of a lot easier to design your strategy so that you only need to be right about one thing to make money.
-
-
Got it! :) my concern is that trades rooted in economic ideas might also need multiple things to work out (geopolitical participants, laws working the way you expect), and Im not savvy enough to know which econ rationales are legit and which are bogus lol.Any ML/stat books y dig?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.