there is at least one person that I follow on Twitter that I would give my money to invest if they started a hedge fund tomorrow
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Bonecondor
Of people who don’t already run or work at a hedge fund? Would think about
@goodalexander@KrisAbdelmessih though would still want to see track. Don’t know what@modestproposal1 or@MagnusMacro do for a living but could be good candidate too. Bar is very high!1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @Bonecondor and
Lots of people who already run a fund or equivalent who I would invest with if they had capacity and I could meet the minimums —
@MidwestHedgie@NewRiverInvest@jam_croissant@mark_dow@SuperMugatu for example4 replies 2 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @Bonecondor and
Obviously it would be conditional on them having a large % of their net worth invested alongside. Big problem is that if someone starts a fund they can’t continue to trade in the same way they do in their PA — larger size makes it more difficult to be nimble, and
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @Bonecondor and
reporting request, compliance and fee structure induce people to be more conservative than they otherwise would be. Optimal fee structure is like 0%/20% but you can’t run a business like that! Expenses + 10% could be a good compromise.
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
-
Replying to @MidwestHedgie @Bonecondor and
What would you do differently if you had an expense pass through instead of mgmt fee, i.e. mgmt fee = expenses (rent, data, admin + legal, salaries, contractual payouts for sub-PMs) plus a performance fee that left your annual profit unchanged in expectation?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @Bonecondor and
1.5 basically covers everyone's base salaries and our expenses. i don't know about everyone, but the level of available mgmt fee is basically the ceiling to our hiring. when we had room there, we hired. are you offering a model where we get to charge you more when we hire more?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @MidwestHedgie @Bonecondor and
IMO this is the model that best aligns GP/LP interests -- allows you to hire or invest when you think there is a business case, disincentivizes asset gathering, allows you to have sub-PMs with a contractual payout w/o worrying about netting risk.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @MidwestHedgie and
Interesting point on the netting risk, but I would suspect LPs would demand a cap on expenses. ODD is very aggressive on these points.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
To do it without an expense cap the sub-PMs either need to be very good (SR > 1.5) or you need very conservative drawdown limits (i.e. how Millennium, Citadel, Bluecrest etc operate/d)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
