You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Then I’d throw out the explanations that can’t possibly work eg negative gamma exposure, CTAs, risk parity, target vol funds... these would all act in the wrong direction (they are momentum-reinforcing) so can’t be a useful part of the explanation.
Then throw out the nonsense explanations (front running, “the algos” without any eleboration, “passive flows” without an explanation of why they would be counter-trend) or the irrelevant ones (eg charm flows given we are not near an opex)
That leaves us with one possible mechanical explanation, dealer hedging due to positive gamma exposure which *could* cause an intraday reversal although unlikely to cause one as big as what we saw on Friday. A partial answer, not the whole answer.
But look, we don’t need (nor should we expect) mechanical explanations for every market move! Sometimes the market moves just because a big buyer came along for reasons completely unrelated to whatever else was going on at the time. Sometimes it reverses because it looked ...
undervalued to someone and they stepped in to buy at a discount. Sometimes it moves for no goddamn reason whatsoever. If market moves were predictable for mechanical reasons there would be a lot more people keeping quiet and making money off it, not coming onto twitter...
and shouting about it to anyone who will listen. Searching for an explanation for every market move is a game for fools and charlatans. The best most of us can do is stay focused, stick to your process and keep searching for that 1% signal in the noise.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
