they are... if not technically lies, definitely a way to hook you so that they can pass you off into a less well paid role that they can collect a quick commission on
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
actually was it direct hire? Because if you were working with a recruiter they did a terrible job.
kind of ... a recruiter’s objective isn’t to maximise the fee they get from your placement, they want to maximise P(placement) x E(fee|placement) which could be done by reducing the latter term and increasing the former
-
-
I'm not as privy to it but part of why I lied as to my salary was because I'd imagine if you're hiring someone and you find out they're making *significantly* less than your offer, it'd make you wonder if they're as good as they say.
-
but I agree, if you're given a range, obvi they'll want to get you placed and will absolutely sacrifice the latter for the former, but I don't think it's so linear; perhaps more polynomial
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
direct hire. i was v naive coming out of school, i just thought finance was neat
-
only handshake is good for right out of school if u go to at least a semi-target ime (linkedin and recruiters are useless tho did get one interview for a role at a decent name firm, one of those that test math at a super high level and then all u actually do is build dashboards)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.