Spent most of the day paying serious attention to details of one trading strategy — cleaning noise out of the signal, carefully legging into trades, minimising unnecessary turnover etc — and improved Sharpe of the backtest from 1.5 to 2.8
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @quantian1
yes this is fair, in this case I’m pretty sure that the true improvement is < 1.3 but > 0
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @quantian1
I mean you can definitely consider this an indicator of how bad the model was to start with rather than how good the improvements were
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @volatilitysmile @quantian1
I am nothing if not unscrupulously honest
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @volatilitysmile @quantian1
I have simply stuffed all the downside risk into an as-yet-unobserved left tail, allowing me to take a percentage of profits until I blow up and resurface elsewhere with a new identity and suspiciously clean track
4:42 PM - 16 Feb 2021
1 reply
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.