Liquidity becomes lolquidity
-
-
Replying to @nope_its_lily
South Korea has a 10bp transaction tax and no obvious liquidity problems.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod
I guess it really matters what the profit margins of HFT options MMs here are. I don't think in a lot of cases they can absorb 10bp.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nope_its_lily
They wouldn’t continue quoting the same spreads if there was a transaction tax! Spreads would widen but more volume would be transacted near the NBBO because there is more profit margin built in for market makers. Not obvious that it’s worse for liquidity.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod
I mean. I suppose but at the end of the day liquidity in the standard sense of measurement (width of bid-ask) would likely decrease substantially, especially on fairly liquid tickers, no?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nope_its_lily
Yes but the quoted bid-ask is not the main cost you pay when executing an order — the price slippage is. Saw an article earlier today which said you can frequently trade 1% of ADV in SK at the top of book price — that never happens in US.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @nope_its_lily
I thought your whole thing re: liquidity was that trading moves the price more than it used to (eg thinner books, orders being pulled when the price moves toward them etc). A transaction tax fixes some of that (with other costs of course).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod
I'm not tracking why a transaction tax fixes that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nope_its_lily
It incentivises MMs to warehouse risk instead of flipping it and incentives orders to build up near the best bid/offer (instead of tiny size at the NBBO with all real size further back which is what you see in the US)
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod @nope_its_lily
I’m not saying it makes trading *cheaper* I’m saying that the price impact would be lower (though empirically it does seem to be cheaper to trade large sizes in SK, for small and mid caps at least — which is incredible given that there is a 10bp cost built in)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Take a look at the chart in this post — in particular the purple line (SK) is below the blue line (US) for companies below $1bn market cap, that’s including the transaction tax.https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/which-country-has-most-liquid-equities-market-alexander-gerko/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.