But also, do not backtest with open and close prices since you cannot reliably transact at these levels.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @macrocephalopod
In particular because the only reasonable explanation for the intraday/overnight anomaly in SPY is a systemic one-way distortion of either open or closing prices (or both!)
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The first one seems plausible (and testable — look at direction of trade flow in overnight sessions). The second one would not persistently move the price in one direction, would it?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @macrocephalopod
I would still point to open/close distortions as the most likely factor. The close to close return on S&P 500 futures is more volatile than literally any other 24 hour return you could choose (by a *lot* - 17% vs 15.5% in the sample I looked at) which indicates big distortions.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @macrocephalopod
macrocephalopod Retweeted macrocephalopod
Study below. I said SPX but this was using ES futures mid prices.https://twitter.com/macrocephalopod/status/1358222923329323008 …
macrocephalopod added,
macrocephalopod @macrocephalopodReplying to @mpp75214 @FREAK0NAUT and 2 othersI am a nerd so I just did the analysis (2013-2020). SPX volatility is higher from close to close is higher than literally any other 24 hour period you could choose. As I said, massive price distortions around the close from market-on-close orders. pic.twitter.com/KpXgV8Fu0K0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Possibly! May look later
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.