Would argue it’s not about derivatives, but rather the assumptions about frictions. EMH requires nearly perfect liquidity (~infinite elasticity). Any violations eventually lead to NOPEville. https://twitter.com/nope_its_lily/status/1358084230895439873 …
-
-
Sure, I guess we can separate a quote which I'd say is a one-sided attempt at a transaction from a transaction. Although again I suppose this is semantics anyway, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As
@MarkGutman9 says the key assumption of EMH is frictionless transmission of information, not frictionless trading. You can have an efficient market (in the sense of EMH) in the presence of transaction costs and market impact.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.