A few things that I didn't cover yesterday when I talked about equity factor models (it's a huge area and it's impossible to more than scrape the surface)https://twitter.com/macrocephalopod/status/1356731277337108482?s=20 …
-
-
A quant equity market neutral strategy might have a market factor, 20-40 industry factors, maybe ~10 country factors, 0-10 other risk factors (e.g. commodity exposure, currency exposure) and 10-50 alpha factors. So anywhere from 30-100 factors would be pretty common.
Show this thread -
3. Wait, so you can literally make a factor out of anything? Yes -- you hear a lot about the well known ones like value, momentum quality etc but there are hundreds of others which are widely known in academia and industry and thousands of proprietary in-house factors.
Show this thread -
One way to tell if a factor is meaningful is to see how well it explains risk in the cross-section (equivalently what is the volatility of the factor return). For example the US market factor has ~20% annualized vol, a big factor like momentum will have 8-10% annualized vol, and
Show this thread -
other factors that explain a meaningful component of returns might have 3-6% annualized vol. By comparison a random factor (literally generate random factor exposures between -1 and +1 each day) will have annualized vol of ~1% on the top 2,000 US stocks.
Show this thread -
So if your factor return has only 1-2% annualized vol it is probably not explaining much risk. It may still have a positive expected return, but I would be skeptical whether that is real vs. over-fitting to past data.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.