Or you can get more esoteric, e.g. a factor representing all stocks that have recently been upgraded by analysts, or a factor representing stocks that are highly shorted.
-
Show this thread
-
The return of stock i on day t is modeled as a linear combination of the unknown factor returns plus an unknown residual, where the dependence of stock i on factor j on day t is given by the *known* exposure X(i, j, t)pic.twitter.com/CbdvNRGura
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
If we understand that r, f and epsilon are vectors and X is a matrix then we can drop all the subscripts and write it in matrix notation which is much easier. It's important to understand that the exposures X are known in advance, and its the factor returns f that are unknownpic.twitter.com/uKK7PuGjuQ
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Now you have a set of linear equations on each day, and you can solve the linear equations to get the vector of factor returns for each day using the normal equation -pic.twitter.com/YwVkUzSM69
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
What's the point of this? The factor models tells you how the covariance matrix of stocks is related to the covariance matrix of factors - it's the sum of the covariance due to factor exposures - Σ_f - and the covariance of the residuals Ω which is normally assumed to be diagonalpic.twitter.com/H7ruwNaEtR
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Now instead of estimating the ~2 million parameters of a 2000 x 2000 stock covariance matrix, you just need to estimate ~800 parameters of a 40 x 40 factor covariance matrix -- your risk model just got a whole lot simpler.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Even more interestingly, if you are not just a risk manager but a quant equity pm, you can take expectations and get a model for the expected return (or alpha) of each stock in terms of the expected returns on each factor --pic.twitter.com/JflXE3Qj8V
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
If you're doing this you would normally treat some factors as "risk" factors which have zero expectation (i.e. you want to hedge them to minimise risk) and some factors as "alpha" factors which have positive expectation, as well as risk --
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jfeckstein
They’re different (but related) problems. A quant equity pm cares about finding factors with high alpha relative to their risk. A risk manager at a pod shop cares about finding factors with high risk but relatively low alpha, to hedge them and maximise exposure to the
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
idiosyncratic alpha that the PMs generate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.