“buying companies with consistent profits” were less well known and could generate decent returns on their own. But an under-appreciated factor is that it was much easier back then to value your book with stale marks, which mechanically leads to
-
-
Show this thread
-
both lower volatility and lower beta to your benchmark, both of which inflate your risk-adjusted performance figures. You could even manipulate your marks to make drawdowns look smaller. The “good old days”.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.