It doesn't change the trackingness much from what I remember, although in the context of the hypothesis it makes no sense.
-
-
That's saying there's a causal and reverse relationship between the two, which isn't really substantiated by what we've found or the data we have. There's a bit more evidence to imply the opposite causal relationship, and that explanation doesn't really explain why
-
NOPE tends to reverse in a predictable way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are times where it diverges, but with the way I calculated the correlation, it’s never enough data points to make a sizable dent in the correlation coefficient
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would love to get to the bottom of this, I feel like we’re talking past each other. Happy to explain what I mean, with data, if you dm.
-
Well I think part of the misunderstanding is the way NOPE is used to trade. It’s used as a mean reversion indicator, so while it correlates while it correlates w/ price movement, we use it to try to predict when to STFR and BTFD
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.