This independent evaluation happened because @gdemom and I showed the dire need for it... https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19439342.2011.587017 … ...and because of the wisdom of (then) DfID officials including Nick York and Gail Marzetti:https://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/dfids-approach-to-impact-evaluation-part-i …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
At the time, the Project trashed us personally. It said we were obstructing "the alleviation of suffering". https://www.cgdev.org/publication/new-transparency-development-economics-lessons-millennium-villages-controversy-working … All we wanted was transparent and independent social science, which is the right way to alleviate suffering. That has finally arrived.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
To be fair everyone with a brain knew millennium villages were nonsense and unethical.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Great to see this out. I will shamelessly use this as an example to draw attention to our 2018 World Development paper that uses local land values in and near the Sauri, Kenya MV to evaluate the project using hedonic pricing methodshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X17302176 …
-
That paper is brilliant and inventive. And has methodological application far beyond this context. Hats off.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.