was tempted to argue semantics of strategy v plan etc, but your point is a really good one. In fact, I didn't need to respond ...
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
In some ways yes, if you want people to follow along, a bit like a cake recipe with instructions otherwise do people can just go
@lukewHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
if a plan just includes the what, it's still a plan, though at a certain fidelity. It takes why as input and infers the need for how.
-
...it doesn't mean it's an incomplete plan. Every fidelity infers following action, which can be either defining the how or execution
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
If your plan includes what you're doing and why and how, but not what you are *going* to be doing... then time to update it :-)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Agreed, every plan should have a how. The why is aka "command intent". Should have a time component as well.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.