Now Sir Geoffrey Nice making clear that the work of Etham Gutman has not been relied upon by the Tribunal. Significant. Gutman’s work includes speculation about organ harvesting and crematoria.
-
Show this thread
-
Sir Geoffrey now outlining the importance of the documents leaked to the Tribunal analysed by
@adrianzenz and reviewed by@ReasonablyRagin and@JimMillward Goes on to criticise governments for refusing to participate. Especially the United States, given their determination.1 reply 7 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
Makes clear that the Tribunal is working to the highest criminal standard: proof beyond reasonable doubt. Sir Geoffrey also explaining the state of mind of perpetrators.
1 reply 9 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Returning to the question of whether “there was a plan”. Before the leak, a conclusion had already been reached that a vast operation of state repression could not be possible without authorisation at the highest levels. This conclusion was merely reinforced by the leak.
1 reply 7 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
Citing the
#XinjiangPapers Sir Geoffrey places responsibility squarely in the lap of Xi Jinping. “Initiated and sustained by the Party Secretary”.1 reply 12 retweets 32 likesShow this thread -
Tribunal “is satisfied” that the policies of repression could not have happened without explicit authorisation “from the very top” Is satisfied: - sexual violence is widespread - circa 16k mosques desecrated - mass torture happening - built an very extensive prison network
1 reply 12 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
Significant. Tribunal “is satisfied” that the PRC is implementing population optimisation program with the long term aim of reducing the minority population. Biggest hint so far that the Tribunal may reach a genocide determination.
6 replies 10 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
Overall strategy of population optimising according to Tribunal has three main strands: - population dilution - transfer out of region - reduction of birth rates Hundreds of thousands of people affected at a minimum.
1 reply 7 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
Brief reference to forced labour - affecting hundreds of thousands. And child separation for the purposes of eradicating Uyghur culture. Now turning to points of law.
1 reply 6 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
Sir Geoffrey now outlining controversy other whether or not genocide requires mass killing. Lots of stuff about “sociological genocide” - Dr Zwaan’s evidence does not loosen the legal tests, but help to understand how we might understand state intention in context.
1 reply 7 retweets 27 likesShow this thread
Sir Geoffrey sets out the 11 acts necessary to establish Crimes Against Humanity. The Tribunal is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that 9 of the 11 are proven beyond reasonable doubt AND that perpetrators knew that this was a systematic attack on Uyghurs.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @lukedepulford
Does that mean the verdict of Uyghur Tribunal is Crime Against Humanity but not Genocide?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.