This is a plastic six pack ring. I don't want any animals getting stuck, so I always cut mine such that there are no more loops. However, I am also lazy. How can I minimize the number of cuts required?pic.twitter.com/fA3w7Mv8Y9
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Variants: 1. Assume that "cut" means transecting exactly one segment. 2. Assume that "cut" means transecting an arbitrary number of segments along one line. 3. What if the ring can be folded?
I'm pretty sure variant 1 is trivial: each cut can, at best, reduce the number of loops by one, so the number of necessary cuts is equal to the number of loops: 14. Variant 3 is also probably trivial; I assume there's a way to fold the ring such that all loops overlap, so 1 cut.
As for variant 2, I have no idea! Practically speaking, though, I don't have a pair of scissors that can transect the entire ring. So the most useful solution would involve a fold (or two).
Actually I guess variant 2 is also trivial. 3 cuts is obviously sufficient, but 2 cuts is not.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.