https://github.com/lukechampine/ply … finally reached 100 stars after 2 years. Would be fun to revive someday, if I could figure out how to implement concise function literals (https://github.com/lukechampine/ply/issues/3 …). But surprisingly, I've found that my enthusiasm for map/filter/reduce methods has cooled...
(Macros, I think, are not the right choice here either: it's still difficult to chain them efficiently, and they tempt you to reuse a single generic-but-suboptimal implementation of each transform.)
-
-
I guess there's a fundamental trade-off here: if you merely *denote* a block of code as a map transform, you might be mistaken, whereas a map function will definitely be a map function.
Show this thread -
At any rate, it seems like like there's an opportunity for a new systems language to provide dataflow-style constructs without having to compromise on performance; and perhaps this could be accomplished via tooling moreso than syntax.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.