Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @lrw148

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @lrw148

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    Those poor, innocent institutions, just minding their own business (coup) when MeanOleTrump came along & threw "accelerant" on them... Actually, all he did was shine a light on their corruption & conspiracy.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Huge poll for Pres Trump. In addition to headline numbers, the details impress, too. On the economy, Gallup finds 49% minority approval. Validates a recent Fox News poll showing 52% Hispanic approval for Trump on economy. The tide is turning...

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati

    Exactly. This is why this Ukraine stuff is an even bigger joke.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I don't know who needs to hear this but Biden was never Trump's political rival for even a second

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Media blaming Trump for their own promulgation of a false and dangerous theory that Trump won 2016 via Russia collusion. Insane corruption of our media on full display today.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Joe Walsh tried to trash President Trump at an Iowa GOP caucus. Iowans BOOED him off the floor. What an epic and embarrassing backfire!

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    This is the left. This is how they react when another American is diagnosed with advanced-stage lung cancer Truly sick. By the way: I wonder if Tariq knows that Rush’s Show, where he “spews dangerous anti-black racism” is produced and engineered by a black man? 🤔

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Schiff called 18 witnesses: Volker Kent Taylor Hill Sondland Williams Vindman Yovanovitch Morrison Cooper Hale Sandy McKinley Reeker Croft Anderson Holmes Atkinson As for POTUS: He couldn’t call ANY witnesses! His counsel wasn’t even allowed in the room A sham from the start!

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    These are the people editing Wikipedia

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Do Senators running for POTUS violate the public trust and act in their own personal interest when they seek to remove their chief political rival from office?

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    If Bernie, Warren, or Klobuchar vote to impeach Trump while they are candidates for 2020 they would be committing the exact same offense they are accusing him of

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    BREAKING ⇨ Democrats just voted to make it harder for a President of the United States to defend America against foreign enemies. They are jeopardizing our national security.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    The chief justice, who is not a member of the Senate, is censoring U.S. senators to protect the anti-Trump leaker who started the entire impeachment farce? That is wildly inappropriate.

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Honest question: Did a single reporter ever ask a sitting Democrat whether or not they’d become a “shill” for Obama?

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    HUGE!... After Removing Ukrainian Prosecutor Shokin, Obama's State Department Plotted with Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella in White House - Then Pushed Steele Dossier to FBI via

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    The very crime they accuse of doing...THEY DID! And then tried to hide it! Sorry Dem/Socialists/Media your game is over...

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Wrong. There are myriad conservative intellectuals who didn't fall down the NeverTrump rabbit hole. And, there are plenty more who are ready to replace those who exiled themselves.

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Jay Sekulow just made an outstanding point If it's important to protect the whistleblower's communications - how could it not be important to protect the President's communications?

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Journalists who proudly publish information on classified and other sensitive national security information because they unilaterally decide “the public should know”- Are *SCANDALIZED* at the thought of anyone uttering the name of the “whistleblower” Such dishonest hacks.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·