Louise BrealeyVerified account

Your reaction was totally valid. The DM is hate propaganda. That's not what free speech is for.

Who are you to subjectively define what's 'hateful'? The principle of free speech is upheld to stop people like you.

In fact, I am entitled to an opinion as much as you are. I think it's hate speech. If you don't, that's your issue.

So if we're both entitled to an opinion, why do you feel that yours is valid enough to oppress the rights of other?

Right back at you, my friend. You came onto my TL to criticise my opinion that Loo was right.

Except my opinion isn't that someone should be able to steal property and make a decision about what others can read.

Your right to hold and act out any opinion ends when you infringe on the rights of others.

Look, you don't agree with her actions, I do. I abhor the DM and all it stands for, you don't. Why are you lecturing me?

it's a pretty big leap to get to book burning.

It's not much different to the idiots that are comparing Trump to the Nazi's. Think.......put brain into gear.

if you can't see the similarities between Trump's America and Hitler's Germany I suggest you open a history book

disposable. It's worse than hating them, they don't even exist except as ways to acquire more wealth and power.

There's an awful lot of what you think going on here, rather than any actual evidence.

and? Where is your evidence to the contrary?

How about the fact he's yet to do anything ?

an emotional reaction when the emotion is morality and righteous anger is a good one and we need more of it and thanks.

I don't think there are implications for free speech and it is not a springboard to bookburning. Good on you.

Fascism isn't usually one big gesture, it's little acts which salami slice away freedom.

I agree, but she's not denying their right to publish or readers' to read, just making it bit harder