CS 3803 (Serve Learn Sustain) - This was the first course I took at Georgia Tech which exposed me to human centered design and was the first time I was asked to consider whether something should be built at all. A truly amazing course!
-
Show this thread
-
CS 4641 (Machine Learning) - This course needs to deeply engage with the societal implications of ML and feminist critical data studies
1 reply 0 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
CX 4220 (Intro High Performance Computing) - Engage with the historical roots of HPC in the military industrial context
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
CS 3630 (Intro Perception & Robotics) - I actually think this course did a good job discussing self-driving cars, but the course didn't discuss the extremely close relationship between robotics and the military industrial complex
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
CS 4510 (Automata and Complexity) - Once again, I think theory needs to be situated within the historical context (read: war) in which it arose
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @nprandchill
Jordan, thank you for a very important thread. I do have a question about your Algorithms and Theory comments. I absolutely understand the point about the context of their origin. I think what sometimes gets blurred is whether that turns out to be *incidental*...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lorenterveen @nprandchill
or somehow affects the actual *content*. For example, is a particular algorithm, proof technique, or concept inherently "militaristic"? I sometimes hear people implying the latter, but have not come across a convincing case (I don't know that any such case ever is offered).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lorenterveen @nprandchill
By the way, I'm not a theorist (at all), so have no emotional commitment to defending theoretical approaches in CS. I simply would like to understand the criticisms that are floating around at their best.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lorenterveen
Thank you so much for you kind words! I am absolutely not the best person to make this argument, but to your point about whether the theory would change Lenore Blum has been talking about alternative theoretical models of computation recently
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nprandchill @lorenterveen
I would also add that even without debating the fundamental underpinnings like Dr. Blum has mentioned, another reason to histroicize theory is the boundaries of what we know and what we don't in this domain have been so closely shaped by military priories
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That certainly makes sense, and would be interesting to elaborate. Clearly, I think external 'pressures' have led people to study certain types of problems rather than others.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.