Someone posted to #cscw2020 that when we are able to go back to in-person events, we don't want to lose the inclusivity benefits of remote participation. I agree, but don't know how to do this. Specifically, we simply cannot replicate the in person experience remotely.
-
Show this thread
-
As far as I can tell, this absolutely means that the remote experience will be a second-class experience compared to in-person. I am observing what people are doing now and thinking about ways we can create a great hybrid experience, but...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
I certainly don't think I'm smart enough to figure out how to avoid "remote participation is second class".
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @lorenterveen
Andrés Monroy-Hernández Retweeted Andrés Monroy-Hernández
We should embrace the best of remote and the best of co-location, rather than trying to bend one into the other. Co-location should be about socialization. Remote about content and broadening reach. Here is a thread with some insights from other people:https://twitter.com/andresmh/status/1318206145773883393 …
Andrés Monroy-Hernández added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Thank you Andres! That's the thread I was thinking about
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
flying,
jetlag, present for 15 min, answer 2 or 3 questions.
During COVID: Join Zoom, play video, answer 2 or 3 questions.