Conversation

Replying to and
I think most WBTC is operating in defi, controlled by private keys. Quite a bit of lightning btc is operated/controlled by KYC'd financial intermediaries... Not sure which has a higher self-custody ratio. It'd be an interesting study...
14
128
Replying to and
The WBTC is self-custodied. You can argue (fairly) that the backing BTC is not. But since one can trade WBTC permissionlessly into other fully self-custody assets easily (like ETH via Uniswap or back into BTC via Thorchain) it's not correct to assume all WBTC is permissioned.
6
34
Replying to and
Uniswap and Thorchain are liquidity pools, not order books, but your point still stands. Nobody should consider WBTC = BTC. The former has risks the latter doesn't. But that doesn't mean WBTC is useless/worthless either.
5
26
Not in-depth, but from eyeballing top capacity nodes I'd estimate ~50% of lightning capacity is managed by custodians. This is to be expected not just due to convenience, but because most payments are b2b & c2b, not c2c as I explained in this presentation
Regardless, the avg person is like water - find the easiest route. They’ll choose a custodial route 9/10 times. It’ll be a thing as adoption goes up. In many ways, lightning looks like a rebuild of 1980s commercial banking - custodial silos. It does have optionality though.
1