I think most WBTC is operating in defi, controlled by private keys.
Quite a bit of lightning btc is operated/controlled by KYC'd financial intermediaries...
Not sure which has a higher self-custody ratio. It'd be an interesting study...
The WBTC is self-custodied.
You can argue (fairly) that the backing BTC is not.
But since one can trade WBTC permissionlessly into other fully self-custody assets easily (like ETH via Uniswap or back into BTC via Thorchain) it's not correct to assume all WBTC is permissioned.
You can trade WBTC as long as other people post asks. If there's a loss of confidence in the management of the underlying asset, you're gonna have a hard time finding an exit trade...
Uniswap and Thorchain are liquidity pools, not order books, but your point still stands.
Nobody should consider WBTC = BTC. The former has risks the latter doesn't.
But that doesn't mean WBTC is useless/worthless either.
And I find both fruits to be delicious.
Joking aside, has anyone done analysis on what portion of lightning btc is held by permissioned intermediaries (Strike, Chivo, etc)?
Not in-depth, but from eyeballing top capacity nodes I'd estimate ~50% of lightning capacity is managed by custodians.
This is to be expected not just due to convenience, but because most payments are b2b & c2b, not c2c as I explained in this presentation
#DEX liquidity pools
#Bitcoiners have a difficult time to wrap their heads around it,, they need a bit more time for understanding.. Ill just keep repeating this information like a broken record, standard procedure
Regardless, the avg person is like water - find the easiest route.
They’ll choose a custodial route 9/10 times. It’ll be a thing as adoption goes up.
In many ways, lightning looks like a rebuild of 1980s commercial banking - custodial silos. It does have optionality though.