I'm going to try to unpack the reasoning here. Washington Post suspends a writer for tweeting a credible link to a story about Kobe. She's doxxed, goes into hiding and alerts her editors. Editors respond by placing her on administrative leave because:
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
1. Sexual violence is not on her beat....which is national politics. To say that sexual violence is not connected to our politics in the era of
#metoo
and/or the era of Donald Trump is absurd. Of course it is! It's a dominant theme!1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
2. She is on administrative leave because the Post is "reviewing" its social media policies to determine if she violated them. If the Post is not sure if her tweet violated policy, how is that a workable standard for reporters? You have to be able to apply it quickly.
1 proslijeđeni tweet 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
3. She tweeted a screenshot of her email inbox that revealed names of Twitter users who had contacted her, a violation of the Post's agreement with Twitter. If this was the real issue, why not just tell her to delete that tweet? Why all of them?
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
4. I'll just quote: "the tweets displayed poor judgment that undermined the work of her colleagues." The original tweet was a statement of fact linking to a story about a saga that the Post included in its own reporting on Bryant. It's the same judgment her colleagues used.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
If a politician threw out explanations like this the Post wouldn't just accept them.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.