Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ljdursi
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ljdursi
-
Prikvačeni tweet
Grad students! Postdocs! New PIs! I need you to practice some lines. “No, I can’t do that.” “No, we don’t do that here.” (Thread)https://twitter.com/BLaw/status/1111377921623523329 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Most of us know all this already; but non-simulation people can get tripped up when trying to incorporate (or review!) simulation work - and, increasingly, data science model-building work. This is a nice reference to keep in one's back pocket for those occasions 5/5
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
We can run exploratory simulations to inductively build a higher-level model of part of the system being simulated (e.g. how galaxies react under near-collision simulations) and even test hypothesis of that higher level model (under the model of the simulation software). 4/5
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
With simulation software we can do _both_ model building _and_ hypothesis testing (under the model), as long as we're clear which we're doing. 3/5
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Simulation software is a model, not a hypothesis; it is built on, its implementation is verified and its runs are validated. We find limits of its range of validity, we don't disprove it. 2/5
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The Cell paper cited below on hypothesis vs models is worth reading in the context of research computing and simulation broadly to help keep clear in our mind what simulation software is and what you can do with it... 1/5https://twitter.com/davidjglassMD/status/1222166822713282560 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
(ok, 4/3): We actually know a lot about how to design governance of nonprofits, even federated nonprofits. The fact that not only are we choosing to not learn from that expertise but to also not learn from our own mistakes is just infuriating.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Setting up governance without knowing what the role and responsibility of the organization is, is a mistake anyway; ensuring the key accountability is to orgs with a clear conflict of interest (supporting their researchers vs winning contracts and capital funds) is absurd. 3/3
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Yes, Compute Canada v3.0 was particularly broken, but it got that way and remained that way because the membership refused to get involved until the very end. 2/3
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
NDRIO (Compute Canada v4.0) will fail for the same reason versions 1-3 failed; the members should be the researchers who need the ecosystem, not institutions angling for capital funding. 1/3 https://engagedri.ca/index.php/2019/12/24/ndrio-now-recruiting-members-applications-due-jan-24-2020/ …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Don't treat the cloud as a University machine room: imposing academic cluster structures on much more flexible capabilities while spurning 100s of productive managed services is not the way to efficiently deliver services *or* effectively serve specialized needs 7/7pic.twitter.com/EnKgfTqQbz
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The option that *doesn't* make any sense is to take the rigid structures of the "let's offer as many uniform cycles & bytes for as little cost as possible" approach and impose it on the expensive-unit-cost but super flexible and elastic commercial clouds. 6/7
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
But there's real justifications either way. The big uniform cluster is easy to reason about and monitor, and is cheaper for _some_ use cases. The lots of specialized solutions provides better service for the researchers but requires a lot of staff time to set up. 5/7
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Both require a lot of effort expended - one to make custom solutions , the other to fit a round problem into a square queuing system. Specialized by research computing staff vs one-size-fits-most with researchers and trainees doing the work. 4/7
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Academic clusters are about $. You buy one (or a handful) of compute & storage configs and use one (or a handful) queuing policies to try to compromise across the needs of high-need use cases as best you can. Researchers do what they need to do to make it work if they can. 3/7pic.twitter.com/AHNzZiLTYw
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The big advantage of commercial cloud for research computing - besides that there's just a lot of it - is the enormous flexibility in computing models, computing hardware, and research computing staff can put it together to serve the needs of the project. 2/7pic.twitter.com/M4ANhwdczB
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I didn't comment on this blog post from a couple of weeks ago because I thought its main points went without saying in our research computing community but I'm sorry to say I was wrong... 1/7https://forrestbrazeal.com/2020/01/05/code-wise-cloud-foolish-avoiding-bad-technology-choices/ …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Jonathan Dursi proslijedio/la je Tweet
I’ve been asked what’s the primary difference between programming in astrophysics vs. programming in robotics. Here’s a thread on the differences I’ve observed, even though I programmed in the same language (Python) for both:
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Upon reflection, I might have unfairly dismissed concerns about our Christmas tree staying up too long this year.pic.twitter.com/69y3y7vdOs
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Here's a page describing the initial plan for the newsletter, and a first signup. https://www.dursi.ca/newsletter.html
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.