What proportion of math papers (published in reputable journals, say) do you think are wrong, in the sense that the statement of a theorem, lemma, proposition, etc is actually false?
What proportion of math papers (published in reputable journals, say) do you think are wrong, in the weaker sense that non-trivial work is needed to actually prove the statements made in the paper?
-
-
What proportion of math papers (published in reputable journals, say) do you think are wrong, in the sense that not every statement in the paper is true as written?
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
90% though “non-trivial” is tricky to define. I am also not sure this is a good standard. Including more details obfuscates the new/important ideas. One paper I really wanted to abolish the first pages to an appendix and beg readers not to look at them.
-
I think I didn’t express what I was asking clearly — I don’t mean missing details, but genuinely missing ideas. Of course this is a fuzzy line.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.