-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
This is beside the point, but... Ugh, that typography! It's nice to know that at some point they improved some of the typographical wackiness (variables shifting at random between roman and italic and bold; and that plus sign!?) and corrected the misspellings...pic.twitter.com/sklrfBJG6Q
-
Yes, I was wondering if the scan I had access to last night is from some bootleg copy or something -- usually Bourbaki, Publications of the IHES, etc. (pre-1990 or so) are always beautifully typeset.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I'm guessing "law of composition" is their way of saying "associative operation"?
-
Just a function X x X —> X.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I think you’re both right, in a sense. What is “an example”?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
And here I was wondering if it was somehow related to souvlaki...
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.