That what one can legally destroy is one's property. It follows that to prevent the suicide of someone who owns themselves would be a violation of their property rights. 1/?
Show this thread
-
I have no confidence that there are no fatal flaws in this argument but it is funny that as a libertarian I never thought about why it is that people own themselves by default.
Show this thread
many ways that property rights change without voluntary transfer though (e.g. life estate, trust as mentioned, forfeitures)
-
-
and many forms of property rights have fixed terms (like leases)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.