have you ever asked a doctor or nurse (not dentist) what a procedure will cost before consenting to it?
-
Show this thread
-
my hypothesis about this is that in the US the economics of health care are enormously distorted because it is taboo to ask about costs up front because this violates the sacredness of life, which we must pretend is not a question of money
7 replies 3 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @chaosprime
sacredness of life seems pretty universal not just US - but there’s something there shielding medicine from being a true market
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana @chaosprime
why allude to a mysterious "something"? we know with absolute certainty what the thing is: the insurer payment model.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
me, an idiot: "I bet I get sick" insurer, a genius: "I bet you don't, pay me $7000/year for counterparty risk premium"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @chaosprime
does it also apply to other insured things? the level of fucked upness seems peculiar to medicine
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana @chaosprime
I think that's a yes. Credit default swaps, for example, are a type of insurance that nuked international credit markets into smithereens in 2008. Different particular pathology, same general cause: insurance is an inappropriate finance model for very many things.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
in the case of CDS the market that was distorted was home mortgages. other forms of insurance have to be very particularly regulated to avoid some of the obvious insanely perverse incentives (life insurance is the canonical example).
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
in case it's not clear, insurance has a tendency to transfer risk in perverse ways. it's designed to be a risk transfer mechanism so it's not that surprising. it's possible to transfer risk to the wrong place, and the most wrong place of all is **everyone else**
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @danlistensto @chaosprime
ok problem is not just insurance here but lumping stuff that shouldn’t be under the insurance model at all in that
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
having the idea that non-catastrophic health costs are “covered by insurance” somehow, not paid in money
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana @chaosprime
yes, this is my policy preference too. insurance is appropriate for catastrophic, low-probability events. it is totally perverse for mundane consumer spending.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.