Some bad science is great art.
-
-
Replying to @literalbanana
"Bad science" as in 1) genuine science that led to false conclusions due to inferior methods/experiments, sparse/outdated evidence, etc, or 2) pseudoscience? (I know it's more of a continuum...)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @dkpseudo
I meant “having no evidentiary value to support an inference of causal regularity” or something, so either could fit
6:41 PM - 19 Feb 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.