"Bad science" as in 1) genuine science that led to false conclusions due to inferior methods/experiments, sparse/outdated evidence, etc, or 2) pseudoscience? (I know it's more of a continuum...)
-
-
-
I meant “having no evidentiary value to support an inference of causal regularity” or something, so either could fit
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why are you corrupting young minds
-
Yeah Mr. Banana, hasn’t mass media and public education done enough harm already? Stop this insanity or I’ll peel you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this feels right haha
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.